The Bad Boy of Pseudo-Journalism Exposes Himself
If a house is burned to the ground, you can whine about the firemen or criticize the building material -- but first you blame the guy who started the fire, right?
Last week, a government worker named
But once the whole speech was revealed -- proving the clip was way out of context -- her bosses were booed, the
And the guy who started the fire?
As of today, he still has matches.
But Breitbart lit the fire. He blew on the flames.
Breitbart is where this sad story begins, where the blame lies and where the punishment should be doled out -- if there were any you could dole out.
Sadly, how do you punish a blogger like Breitbart? He simply slithers back into the muck that some confuse with journalism. Who does he have to answer to?
Nobody.
Not the whole truth
"I am," Breitbart boasted to the media last week, "public enemy No. 1 or 2 to the
There are several things wrong with that statement. First, I doubt he counts that much.
Second, his journalism? It's not journalism if you only look for one point of view, post other people's stuff and don't even acknowledge how using chopped-up material to paint a full picture is wrong.
"Let me think about that," was what Breitbart said when asked if he might have vetted the Sherrod footage more carefully if given another chance.
Let me think about that?
Some people have called this incident a referendum on racism. I don't think so. It was a referendum on editing. A referendum on Internet blogging. A referendum on our blazing desire for explosive moments -- even out of context -- and our creeping slowness to see the full picture.
Anyone who watches the whole tape of Sherrod's speech sees an honest woman who tells of an incident with a white farmer 24 years ago that made her question her own prejudices. She goes on to say such things as:
"Working with him made me see that it's really about those who have vs. those who don't ... and they could be black; they could be white; they could be Hispanic....
"God helped me see that it's not just about black people ... I've come to realize that we have to work together ... we have to overcome the divisions that we have...."
Yet, even after all that, Breitbart's website contains pieces like "If Anyone Needs To Apologize, It's
Sounds like he can't get past something himself.
What standards?
And that, of course, is hate. Hate makes the political world spin, particularly the blog world. The shrieking
Breitbart broke it, he bought it, but instead of taking responsibility for it, he spins and points to anyone else, the liberals, Obama, the
"I believe that I'm held to a higher standard," Breitbart actually told Politico. "If this video showed a picture of a Caucasian talking in the exact same way but talking about a black person with an audience affirming and clapping that behavior, the reporter would be getting a Pulitzer Prize right now."
Response: 1) No, he wouldn't. 2) Showing an edited video is not "reporting." 3) You, Breitbart, are not held to any standard.
And that's the problem.
(C) 2010 BY THE DETROIT FREE PRESS DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
Licensing and Reprints
TMS Licensing: We license popular cartoon characters, puzzles and content from renowned creators for print, interactive, TV and film, mobile and board games. TMS also licenses unique commentary in politics, travel, health, business and other categories.
TMS reprints: We grant websites, newsletters, books and other publications permission to reprint any of the 150-plus columns, cartoons, magazine articles, photos and graphics found in our catalog. This content also can be used in corporate communications and training materials.